2017 Mercedes-Benz C300 4Matic Coupe: Better (and Less Costly) Than That Orange Lexus RC350
While it’s true that TTAC’s managing editor spent last week in an $11,595 2016 Chevrolet Spark, auto writers living on the east coast of Canada are rather more accustomed to receiving highly optioned cars from the press fleet.
There was the 2016 Mazda CX-9 Platinum priced, in Mazda USA speak, at $45,215. A couple of weeks before, the new Honda Civic Coupe arrived in Touring trim — not Si, not Type R — at a U.S. market price of $26,960. Toyota Highlander? Make it a Limited Hybrid at $51,445.
So what a pleasure it was to see a 2017 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupe pull into my driveway and see no AMG badges, the basic 2.0-liter turbo/all-wheel-drive combo, and only $7,540 in options. A mere scintilla of options. Scarcely a soupçon of selections from the lengthy list of Mercedes-Benz choices.
Thus, with shockwaves reverberating around GCBC Towers, a 2017 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupe arrived as a successor to our 2016 Lexus RC tester, a direct C-Class Coupe competitor, with $6,000 of savings in hand.
Yes, as-tested, the Benz was $6,000 less than its Lexus rival. And yes, the Benz is the better car.
CABIN
The tacked-on screen with a surround that would seem cheap on an iPad knock-off is a major letdown given the material quality and sense of solidity elsewhere inside the Benz, but it doesn’t cancel out the hi-lux vibes the C300 sends out from optional open-pre dark ash wood trim, the saddle brown leather, or the HVAC vents’ smooth operation. Neither does the silly column shifter or the sunroof that sounded like it was crunching gravel.
The Lexus, by comparison, was a more feature-laden car: proximity access, push-button start, and cooled seats, as examples. But luxury isn’t always about stuff. The Mercedes feels and looks and smells like it should cost $15,000 more than it does.
MOTION
One week earlier, I was forever telling new passengers that the RC350 F Sport isn’t half as sporty as they thought it was going to be. I was constantly making allowances for an orange car with outrageous styling that was bound not to shock and awe.
Be very sure, the C300 4Matic, even with upgraded 245/40R18 Continental ProContact GXSSRs on 18-inch five-spoke alloys, is more keen on sporty cruising than sports car enthusiasm. But when you demand more from the Benz on a twisty road, turn-in is sufficiently swift, the 7-speed automatic shirks its sometimes awkward low-rev behaviour to snap off shifts, and the car as a whole gets down to business.
The RC’s excessive girth causes Lexus to hold up a metaphorical caution sign. “I can do this if you really want me to,” the Lexus seemed to say, “or we can just let the Benz have its fun. We’ll catch up later.”
TORQUE
As a result, in routine driving, regardless of what might happen on an airport runway, the Mercedes-Benz feels like the livelier car. I won’t lie: these modern turbos in small engines make me miss naturally aspirated throttle response. In action, however, when you’re following a dawdling tractor-trailer onto a highway and you need to squirt out quickly into traffic, I want my torque now.
Revs are fun. Smooth, V6 revs are even more fun. Instantaneous response is not as fun, but it is practical.
TWO FOR ONE
The Lexus RC350 F Sport had a button, too. Press for Normal, turn left for Eco, turn right for Sport or Sport+. The RC is undeniably a more athletic and responsive car in Sport+ than in Eco. Rather than dull the throttle, the RC becomes more hyper. The steering is weightier, the ride is firmer. The differences, however, are not astounding — it’s very much the same car.
In the Mercedes-Benz, however, shuffling the little toggle/wheel marked Dynamic from Eco through to Sport+ reveals an entirely different car. Gone is the detached cruiser and in comes the exuberant go-getter champing at the bit. There’s also an individual setting that allows you to mix and match the best of multiple worlds.
Thus, the Mercedes-Benz C300 4Matic wasn’t just the less expensive of the two luxury coupes, it was more than one car.
This article previously referred to this C300 4Matic as a 2016 model year car. It is actually a 2017 model year car, and the article was updated for clarity.
[Images: © 2016 Timothy Cain / The Truth About Cars]
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.
More by Timothy Cain
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Jkross22 Sure, but it depends on the price. All EVs cost too much and I'm talking about all costs. Depreciation, lack of public/available/reliable charging, concerns about repairability (H/K). Look at the battering the Mercedes and Ford EV's are taking on depreciation. As another site mentioned in the last few days, cars aren't supposed to depreciate by 40-50% in a year or 2.
- Jkross22 Ford already has an affordable EV. 2 year old Mach-E's are extraordinarily affordable.
- Lou_BC How does the lower case "armada" differ from the upper case "Armada"?
- TMA1 Question no one asked: "What anonymous blob with ugly wheels will the Chinese market like?"BMW designers: "Here's your new 4-series."see also: Lincoln Nautilus
- Ivor Honda with Toyota engine and powertrain would be the perfect choice..we need to dump the turbos n cut. 😀
Comments
Join the conversation
The new C-class is really well put together. But one thing really bothered me at a dealer visit - the trunk lid felt really really lightweight. Corolla-like would be how I would describe it.
As an owner of an 08 ml350 with 85k , I've had only minimal issues. What it boils down to for long term ownership of any car is , would you want to keep driving this despite the hassle of driving a car past it's warranty? Alot of this is based on driving satisfactoin, styling, interior quality , and overall craftmanship. I think this Merc wins in this regard. I think Lexus has some serious styling issues.